2. First off, vonskippy, morse code is still extremely used and still very relevant. Great find. Can't wait to actually make one myself once he releases more info.
Posted at 11:54PM on Nov 18th 2007 by Eric
3. vonskippy:
I have engaged in two-way dialog from Arizona to Japan, using a small 5-Watt CW (morse code) transceiver and a piece of wire thrown up into a tree used as an antenna. In another case, I enjoyed successful communication from Puerto Rico to Indiana (about 1900 miles) using a similar CW (morse)transceiver, a kite to suspend an antenna wire, and a power supply composed of 8 AA batteries.
If you think Morse Code is old, of course you are correct. If you think Morse Code is superfluous or obsolete, well, you don't know what you are talking about.
Given minimal power (8 AA batteries) and no infrastructure (no internet backbone, no satellite, no phone line) name *any* communications technology that allows for real-time point-to-point communication over distances of 2000 miles or more. I'll bet you can't unless it involves Morse, a key, and an RF oscillator.
BTW- Working Morse with batteries and a kite looks like this:
http://www.arrl.org/news/features/2007/11/13/1/
Posted at 12:45AM on Nov 19th 2007 by hp friedrichs
4. I agree with vonskippy, this is a useless method for typing and is outdated.
Although it my be useful for a scenario where all other forms of communication shuts down, why would you want to type with something like this?
Posted at 1:01AM on Nov 19th 2007 by kaelb
5. kaelb-
I can see this as a very useful input method for where a full size keyboard is very impractical, yet text input is a neccessity.
For example, if you were building a car pc, and wanted the driver to be able to operate it, you would want to use a device that doesn't require seeing it to operate (rules out on-screen input methods), is small (where can I hide a full size keyboard without it getting in the way in a typical car?), and simple to learn how to use. This fits all 3.
As far as not needing to see a display to use the device, I'm not aware of any current OS that doesn't have some kind of Text-to-speech software available. (You probably will have audio, as one function of most car pcs is MP3/video playback)
Posted at 1:23AM on Nov 19th 2007 by kc8ufv
6. ... - --- .--. + -... . .. -. --. + .- + .--. . -.. .- -. - .. -.-. + --. .. .-. .-.. + .- .-.. .-.. + .... .- -.-. -.- ... + .- .-. . + ..-. ..- -.
Like I could resist ;)
Posted at 4:37AM on Nov 19th 2007 by chimpoid
7. That, or something similar, could be useful for a wearable PC. Morse, binary, whatever...
Posted at 8:16AM on Nov 19th 2007 by Skyler Orlando
8. I remember reading about a guy who went on very long bike rides and he had 8 buttons underneath each of his fingers in the handlebars of his recumbent bike. He'd write in binary. I thought that was pretty damned ingenious.
Posted at 9:31AM on Nov 19th 2007 by andrew
9. I'm always on the lookout for a one-handed eyes-off text input method. I've seen similar suggestions before, but it all comes down to the time it takes to learn. I don't know Morse, and I don't know any chord keyboard layouts. I would love to be able to improvise one or the other on e.g. a cell phone as a more efficient means of typing, or to design an input device for a wearable that lets you attain near-desktop WPM, but I just don't have the time.
If anybody is still reading these comments: what's the best solution, given the constraints above? Remember, one-handed, eyes-off, and *fast*.
Posted at 1:28PM on Nov 19th 2007 by James
11. nice vonskippy. its obviously pointless. if its usb powered, chances are you wouldn't be using it unless you had a device capable of transmission, and if it wasn't, you would be screwed because this is only for input and not transmission.
Posted at 9:37PM on Nov 19th 2007 by Jordan
12. Morse code is great. The USB devices you are using all day long do it: serial communication.
But what's wrong with the single-button keyboards for morse code? The slider seems hardly ergonomic to me, especially if you hold it the way it is shown in the video. Tapping on a button worked well for centuries.
13. Actually a simple numeric keypad similar to the ones on cellphones would be both faster and easier to master.
Most cellphone users are experienced SMS-typists, and although you would probably have to do without an automatic dictionary (since there'd be no display to confirm words), it's still pretty quick once you get your thumb dancing. The few errors you'd make is comparable to the ones made with the morse interface.
And imagine it's wireless of some sort, you could write whatever you want whenever you want. I see tons of uses, many of which could even replace a normal keyboard.
Posted at 9:58AM on Nov 20th 2007 by JonasW
14. I can see something like this being used as input device for the severely physically handicapped.
@Andrew
Your thinking of the BEHEMOTH and it's earlier cousins the Winnebikos. http://microship.com/bike/
15. It's actually faster to send morse code than it is to text message someone.
Posted at 11:10AM on Nov 20th 2007 by Mike
16. Very nice, chimpoid. I like my leetscript firefox extension too.
As a colemak typist, I think it would be interesting to see a keyboard with one of these sliders for each finger.
slide up: top row: qwfpgjluy;
Hit: home row: arstdhneio
slide down: bottom row: zxcvbkm,./
space hit: space
space slide left: tab
space slide right: enter
...but I won't be holding my breath. Just a weird idea.
Posted at 2:05PM on Nov 20th 2007 by ethana2
hack a day serves up a fresh hack each day, every day from around the web and a special how-to hack each week.
All contents copyright © 2008, Hack A Day. All Rights Reserved.
1. Wow, I can't wait for you to stumble across a USB powered Butter Churn, or perhaps a article on repairing buggy whips with old Cat 5 cable.
Posted at 11:52PM on Nov 18th 2007 by VonSkippy